That's the share of gross revenue a typical group spends on the administrative overhead Dion can run — front office workload, software subscriptions, billing labor, and the corporate back office. Dion runs those functions for roughly half of what they cost today.
Clinical labor is deliberately excluded. Dion’s pricing is anchored to overhead functions — which means it structurally cannot bill for replacing a clinician. We augment clinical work; we don’t price against it.
| Overhead line | Typical share of collections | What Dion runs there |
|---|---|---|
| Front desk / admin labor | ~10% | Reception queues, scheduling & recall workload, intake, confirmations |
| Software subscriptions | ~3% | The owned Dion stack replaces the subscription pile — it’s bundled in the wage |
| Accounting / billing labor | ~3.5% | Claims, ERA posting, denials, AR follow-up, statements |
| Corporate office overhead | ~8% | Bookkeeping & close, HR / payroll administration, procurement, reporting |
| Total addressable | ~24.5% | Independent practices without a corporate office: ~16.5% |
Industry-typical shares used for illustration. Your actual stack is measured from your P&L at onboarding — that measurement, not these benchmarks, is what you’re quoted on.
Each AI employee carries a flat monthly wage — far below the loaded cost of the overhead line it absorbs — plus metered usage beyond an included allotment. Software is bundled into the wage; there is no separate subscription line. The engagement is quoted from your actual numbers at onboarding, not from a rate card.
| Benchmark scenario | Dion charge (% of gross) | Client keeps (pts of gross) | Overhead cut |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative | 9% | 15.5 pts | ~63% |
| Balanced (typical) | 11% | 13.5 pts | ~55% |
| Aggressive | 13% | 11.5 pts | ~47% |
Benchmarks for orientation, not the pricing rule. Typical outcome: roughly halve the addressable overhead. The actual figure is computed per client.
Before counting the treatment-acceptance and recall upside the functions drive — that’s revenue, not just cost.
Group economics improve with scale because the corporate bundle is shared across locations while per-location functions stay local.
Both examples are illustrative benchmarks from our pricing model — not guarantees, and not your quote. Your quote is computed from your own collections, payroll, and vendor stack during the onboarding analysis. The analysis never assumes a staffing reduction.
Send your P&L — or start with just an email. We measure your actual overhead stack, show you the functions Dion would run, and give you the savings math for your practice, not a benchmark.
No commitment · We’ll reach out within 1 business day